The greek story tells us, in whispers almost, some strange events that, notwithstanding its bestial characteristics, are sadly hüman, intertwined in öur essence as species.
Why or how everything can begin with someone's nature, preferrably bent and laid towards the ëgoïsm and the self-sufficience: question. What is the mystery of the evil?
The behaviours (ours), understood under a hümanistic more than religious perspective, it talk us near, in our vey ear about some subliminal characteristics of the human evil; and no: nobody's able to understand them...
Sometimes the capacity to perceive is blurred...
I been thinking about some ways of (cosmic equilibrium), i have seen some ways of cosmic equilibrium getting developed subtly, that i am not able in this moment to attribute them to something in concrete as source or origin.
The darwinian laws are certainly right in many aspects; but i am meaning something else; something that keeps those very laws working by itself without reach the collapse: what is the mechanism of the "evil"; and more important yet: what is the mechanism of the "no evil"?
Behind these antique greek tales, there is always a second sight; something that seems not to be concerned in the tale itself, but that unconsciously is concerned; some veiled truths, a deep psychologic or psychopathic vein: where our empathy or remorse comes from?
I have more questions than answers about this point.
It gets complicated when the whole scene, gets influenced under a mental disease: it was Seneca a demented? It was the rhetorically constructed figure of Herakles based upon an insane?
Herakles, not Seneca.
Or many of these behaviours are just product of what i'd call "the evil eye"? The bad eye.
I won't admire gratis to these greeks and their agonal doubtful madness: there is much madness involved in all this.
I am just remarking some pieces of bloody flesh they did throw us; and until the day of today keep on being enigmatic.
Once again i ask: where, where the beast begins and the hüman ends?
-
Why or how everything can begin with someone's nature, preferrably bent and laid towards the ëgoïsm and the self-sufficience: question. What is the mystery of the evil?
The behaviours (ours), understood under a hümanistic more than religious perspective, it talk us near, in our vey ear about some subliminal characteristics of the human evil; and no: nobody's able to understand them...
Sometimes the capacity to perceive is blurred...
I been thinking about some ways of (cosmic equilibrium), i have seen some ways of cosmic equilibrium getting developed subtly, that i am not able in this moment to attribute them to something in concrete as source or origin.
The darwinian laws are certainly right in many aspects; but i am meaning something else; something that keeps those very laws working by itself without reach the collapse: what is the mechanism of the "evil"; and more important yet: what is the mechanism of the "no evil"?
Behind these antique greek tales, there is always a second sight; something that seems not to be concerned in the tale itself, but that unconsciously is concerned; some veiled truths, a deep psychologic or psychopathic vein: where our empathy or remorse comes from?
I have more questions than answers about this point.
It gets complicated when the whole scene, gets influenced under a mental disease: it was Seneca a demented? It was the rhetorically constructed figure of Herakles based upon an insane?
Herakles, not Seneca.
Or many of these behaviours are just product of what i'd call "the evil eye"? The bad eye.
I won't admire gratis to these greeks and their agonal doubtful madness: there is much madness involved in all this.
I am just remarking some pieces of bloody flesh they did throw us; and until the day of today keep on being enigmatic.
Once again i ask: where, where the beast begins and the hüman ends?
-